| 432 | 16 | 177 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
采用Dynaform软件对某汽车前防撞梁成形过程进行了模拟，分析了不同形式的工艺补充面对零件成形的影响，以减薄率为评价标准，最终选取凸模圆角半径25 mm、凹模圆角半径15 mm的两端补充形式和符合零件形状的非平面压料面。采用正交试验法研究了压边力、冲压速度、摩擦因数和模具间隙4个工艺参数对成形结果的影响，获得了工艺参数优化组合为：压边力1100 kN、摩擦因数0.17、冲压速度3000 mm·s-1、凸凹模间隙1.2 t,优化后制件最大减薄率为21.8%,符合制件要求标准。采用优化后的参数进行了实际拉延试验，结果显示，最大减薄率为21.6%,制件成形规律与模拟结果一致。
Abstract：The forming process of an automobile front anti-collision beam was simulated using Dynaform software, and the influence of different forms of process supplements on the forming of part was analyzed. Taking the thinning rate as the evaluation standard, the two ends supplementary form with the punch fillet radius of 25 mm and the die fillet radius of 15 mm and the non-planar binder surface conforming to the part shape were finally selected. The influence of blank holder force, stamping speed, friction factor and die clearance on forming results was studied using orthogonal test method. The optimal combination of process parameters was obtained as follows: blank holder force of 1100 kN, friction factor of 0.17, stamping speed of 3000 mm·s-1, clearance between punch and die of 1.2 t. The maximum thinning rate of parts after optimization is 21.8%,which accords with the required standards of parts. The actual drawing test with optimized parameters was carried out. The results show that the maximum thinning rate is 21.6%, and the forming law of the parts is consistent with the simulation result.
[1] 杜莎.数读2020中国车市：全年汽车销量2531.1万辆，新能源汽车销量同比增长10.9% [J].汽车与配件，2021,(3):54-55.DU Sha.China′s auto market in 2020:Annual vehicle sales of 25.311 million,new energy vehicle sales growth of 10.9% [J].Automotive & Accessories,2021,(3):54-55.
[2] 徐中明，徐小飞，万鑫铭，等.铝合金保险杠防撞梁结构优化设计 [J].机械工程学报，2013,49(8):136-142.XU Zhongming,XU Xiaofei,WAN Xinming,et al.Structural optimization design of aluminum alloy bumper anti-collision beam [J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2013,49(8):136-142.
[3] 危海烟，吴朝晖，董瑞强.防撞梁在汽车碰撞中的性能要求及评估方法研究 [J].机电工程技术，2019,48(6):120-123,162.WEI Haiyan,WU Zhaohui,DONG Ruiqiang.Research on performance requirements and evaluation method of anti-collision beam in vehicle crash[J].Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology,2019,48(6):120-123,162.
[4] 陈泽中，周燕芳，隋鹏远，等.汽车前防撞梁热冲压结构改进与数值模拟[J].锻压技术，2020,45(7):58-65.CHEN Zezhong,ZHOU Yanfang,SUI Pengyuan,et al.Numerical simulation and structure improvement of hot stamping for automobile front anti-collision beam[J].Forging & Stamping Technology,2020,45(7):58-65.
[5] 薛松，周杰.前保险杠加强板回弹分析及工艺控制 [J].热加工工艺，2011,40(3):76-77,81.XUE Song,ZHOU Jie.Springback analysis and process control of front bumper reinforcement plate[J].Hot Working Technology,2011,40(3):76-77,81.
[6] 李琦，纪沙沙，王章忠，等.22MnB5超高强度钢防撞梁的冷冲压成形数值模拟 [J].冶金与材料，2019,39(4):78-80.LI Qi,JI Shasha,WANG Zhangzhong,et al.Numerical simulation of cold stamping forming of 22MNb5 ultra-high strength steel anti-collision beam [J].Metallurgy and Materials,2019,39(4):78180.
[7] 郭亚琼，高亚南，刘东海，等.汽车防撞梁端头压扁成形仿真与分析 [J].塑性工程学报，2020,27(9):53-58.GUO Yaqiong,GAO Yanan,LIU Donghai,et al.Simulation and analysis of flat forming of automobile anti-collision beam end [J].Journal of Plasticity Engineering,202,27(9):53-58.
[8] 苏合新.汽车防撞梁支撑板零件的拉延仿真与模具设计 [D].济南：齐鲁工业大学，2018.SU Hexin.Ddrawing simulation and mold design of automobile anti-collision beam support plate parts [D].Jinan:Qilu University of Technology,2018.
[9] 蒋磊，王龙，李十全，等.基于正交试验的侧围外板拉延成形工艺参数优化研究[J].汽车工艺与材料，2021,(9):42-50.JIANG Lei,WANG Long,LI Shiquan,et al.Study on optimization of drawing process parameters of side wall outer plate based on orthogonal test [J].Automobile Technology & Material,2021,(9):42-50.
[10] 管艳杰.汽车覆盖件冲压成形工艺数值模拟及优化[D].太原：太原科技大学，2012.GUAN Yanjie.Numerical simulation and optimization of stamping forming process for automotive cover parts [D].Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Science and Technology,2012.
基本信息:
中图分类号:U466;TG386
引用信息:
[1]闫华军,邢博,张双杰,等.前防撞梁拉延成形过程分析及工艺参数优化[J].塑性工程学报,2022,29(03):13-18.
基金信息:
石家庄市科学技术研究与发展计划项目（206080167A）
2022-03-22
2022-03-22
2022-03-22